Cardinals news from a Sabermetric point of view

Miller or Rhodes? Both? Neither?

Now that we’ve determined the competition that the would-be Cardinal LOOGys will be facing next season, let’s see which pitchers are best qualified for the job. With Trever Miller and Arthur Rhodes as possible LOOGy solutions, which one is a better fit? Given their records against the likeliest batters they’ll be pitching against, should Cardinal fans be welcoming Miller or Rhodes? Or both? Or neither? Let’s see their career work against the batters:

vs. Miller vs. Rhodes
Batter Team PA SO GPA PA SO GPA
Prince Fielder MIL 7 0 .295
Nate McLouth PIT 7 2 .100
Adam LaRoche PIT 2 1 .725 3 0 .800
Joey Votto CIN 1 0 .950
Kosuke Fukudome CHC 1 0 .700
Corey Patterson CIN 2 0 .350 2 2 .000
Jim Edmonds CHC 7 4 .000 11 2 .064
Michael Bourn HOU 3 1 .317
Craig Counsell MIL 4 1 .525 1 0 .000
Jay Bruce CIN
Paul Bako CIN 1 1 .000
Darin Erstad HOU 4 0 .175 27 4 .104
Mike Fontenot CHC 1 0 .000
Doug Mientkiewicz PIT 4 0 .000 8 1 .276
Carlos Delgado NYM 9 4 .325 35 9 .151
Brandon Moss PIT 2 0 .225
Nyjer Morgan PIT 1 0 .000
Daryle Ward CHC 1 0 .950 2 0 .475
Felix Pie CHC 1 1 .000
Total 57 15 .241 90 18 .170

By those numbers — a .241 Gross-Production Average Against for Miller and .170 for Rhodes — both pitchers seem like good bets for next year; by comparison, the Cardinals’ two main LOOGys last season combined for a .260 GPA vs. lefties. But those stats aren’t really right, since they’re skewed by the batters that the pitchers have faced most often in their careers, not by how frequently they’ll face them in 2009. To weight them acccordingly, we’ll weight the GPAs by the number of anticipated plate appearanced vs. the Cardinals in 2009 — for reference, we’ll throw in Ron Villone, too:

Miller Rhodes Villone
Batter Team PA GPA GPA GPA
Prince Fielder MIL 68 .295 .754
Nate McLouth PIT 54 .100 .368
Adam LaRoche PIT 50 .725 .800 .000
Joey Votto CIN 50 .950 .000
Kosuke Fukudome CHC 49 .700 .225
Corey Patterson CIN 44 .350 .000 .222
Jim Edmonds CHC 44 .000 .064 .349
Michael Bourn HOU 44 .317 .233
Craig Counsell MIL 43 .525 .000 .212
Jay Bruce CIN 42 .000
Paul Bako CIN 38 .000 .350
Darin Erstad HOU 38 .175 .104 .183
Mike Fontenot CHC 36 .000 .000
Doug Mientkiewicz PIT 36 .000 .276 .233
Carlos Delgado NYM 34 .325 .151 .338
Brandon Moss PIT 31 .225 .000
Nyjer Morgan PIT 28 .000 .000
Daryle Ward CHC 27 .950 .475 .113
Felix Pie CHC 26 .000 .450
Total (weighted for 2009)   .287 .334 .232

Now, take these numbers with a grain of salt: Since the sample sizes are usually small for each batter, it’s hard to make too much of them. Still, it’s a reminder that different is not always better, especially when it comes to LOOGys. It’s possible that Ron Villone could do as good a job (or better) as either of the two guys that the Cardinals are dealing with now. The key to Villone’s mediocrity in 2008 was his usage: Righthanders had a .299 GPA off him, while lefties hit only .219. Unfortunately, TLR had him face more righties (121 PA) than lefties (108). If the team intends to hire someone who can face some righties, too (that is, isn’t really a true LOOGy), then perhaps that explains their pursuit of mssrs. Miller and Rhodes, each of whom had a better GPA split vs. righties last year (.272, .253, respectively).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.