Cardinals news from a Sabermetric point of view

Howry signing validates Cardinals’ decision on Springer

If the Giants’ signing of reliever Bobby Howry to a $2.75 million, one-year contract is any indication, the Cardinals played their cards right in not offering arbitration to Type-A free agent Russ Springer. Howry projects to be as good as Springer next season, and more durable, as the Bill James and Marcels systems figure — we’re generating Pitching Runs Created based on last-year’s Run Environment for the NL and 2009 projected Fielding-Independent Pitching instead of ERA:

Pitcher LG IP SO FIP PRC
Springer (James) NL 50 43 4.12 37.0
Springer (Marcels) NL 57 47 4.08 42.2
Howry (James) NL 63 52 4.06 46.6
Howry (Marcels) NL 68 57 4.17 50.3

Despite his subpar 2008, Howry still looks to create between five to eight more runs than the Cardinals’ erstwhile ROOGy. Springer made $3.5 million in 2008, so on the strength of his last two (effective) seasons, he’d be looking at something north of $4.0 million in an arbitrated contract for 2009. Howry is coming off a season in which he made $4.0 million, so you can see how depressed the marketplace is at this point. Granted, Howry is in a slightly different situation, given that he had a really bad 2008 (and Springer had a good one), but the projections still show Howry to be a better deal. If the Giants — and, theoretically, the Cardinals — could sign Howry for less than $3.0 million, it appears that the Cardinals made the right call in not offering arbitration to Springer. And, as both sides have mentioned, they may sign him yet — just for less money.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.