<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the Cardinals have signed Looper instead of dumping Kennedy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fungoes.net/2009/02/25/should-the-cardinals-have-signed-looper-instead-of-dumping-kennedy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fungoes.net/2009/02/25/should-the-cardinals-have-signed-looper-instead-of-dumping-kennedy/</link>
	<description>Official blog of the St. Louis chapter of SABR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fungoes » Blog Archive » Should the Cardinals have signed Looper &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.fungoes.net/2009/02/25/should-the-cardinals-have-signed-looper-instead-of-dumping-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>Fungoes » Blog Archive » Should the Cardinals have signed Looper &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fungoes.net/?p=1670#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>[...] Fungoes » Blog Archive » Should the Cardinals have signed Looper &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fungoes » Blog Archive » Should the Cardinals have signed Looper &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
