Cardinals news from a Sabermetric point of view

Archive for the 'group blogging' Category

United Cardinal Bloggers roundtable: Statistical story of the year?

Monday, November 28th, 2011

[Today's United Cardinal Bloggers roundtable question comes from yours truly. We particularly enjoyed how well Christine Coleman's response reflects her awareness of our peccadilloes.]
The Cardinals punctuated their memorable season with a variety of compelling statistics, ranging from the prodigious (Pujols’s three home runs in Game 3 of the World Series), the unexpected (Kyle Lohse’s career-best 3.67 FIP), the ugly (seven-game losing streak) and the breathtaking (Freese’s WPA in Game 6). What was one of your favorite statistical stories of 2011 and why?
Tie between Pujols Game 3 and Freese in Game 6.
– Daniel Solzman
Mine was winning 90 games… one more than Atlanta to win the Wild Card.
– Tom Knuppel
Interestingly, it seems easier to come up with the statistical stories that I didn’t like than the ones that I did.  The failure of Albert Pujols to hit his benchmarks and continue his streak, the high number of blown saves from early in the year, or the fact that I think someone just now hit into yet another double play.
I think the statistics that stood out to me were how well the offense clicked.  It wasn’t always steady and it could be short circuited by those double plays, but the team finished (in all of baseball) fifth in runs, third in OBP, and fifth in OPS.  They also did this without an over-reliance on the long ball, finishing 13th in that category.  It would seem that whatever Mark McGwire’s philosophy is, he’s able to teach it to the hitters and they’ve picked up on it.
– Daniel Shoptaw, C70 At The Bat
For me, the most important statistic is the 2.15 ERA posted by Carpenter in September. Simply put, we don’t get anywhere in the postseason if he doesn’t do that.
His entire ERA from September 1st through the postseason was a shocking 2.63. Pretty amazing for a 36 year-old who pitched 250+ innings.
There just hasn’t been a competitor like Carpenter in a Cardinal uniform since Gibson, and I love the guy for it. My dream would be to see Carp’s statue outside Busch, or an honorary retirement of his number. To me, he’s one of the greatest Cards I’ve had the pleasure of watching in my lifetime.
– Ray DeRousse, stlcardinalbaseball.com
I agree with Carpenter being in a small elite group, but I would also put 
Joaquin Andujar – Aug 12 to end of ‘82 season, 7-0 with a 1.64 ERA, Cards 10-1 
in those 11 starts, plus another 3-0 in postseason with an ERA around 2, John 
Tudor 20-1 from June 3, 1985, 1.39 ERA  5 shutouts in September and maybe even 
Danny Cox in that conversation.  Still, Chris Carpenter is something special and 
the Bob Gibson comparisons are totally justified.  For that reason, Chris 
Carpenter is my favorite among the current group of Cardinals.
It will be interesting to see the retire 29 discussion start up after his 
retirement.  Something still needs to be done for Curt Flood and Willie McGee, 
but I digress.
My favorite stat is everybody’s favorite punching bag, Kyle Lohse, 14-8 with a 
career low ERA of 3.39. From August 28, Lohse was 3-0 (Cards 4-1 overall) with 
an ERA of 1.64.   Heck, he was 6-1 (Cards 8-2 overall) since his July dead arm 
troubles went away.   The only thing I didn’t like about Lohse’s season was that 
he didn’t go deep into games and put a bit of a load on the bullpen, but he 
threw some great games in the last two months of the season (at Philadelphia, 
Chicago at home).   Yes, his contract is insanely generous, but it is time to 
give Kyle Lohse a break :) .
– Bob Netherton
Here’s my statistic – games played. LaRussa has been lambasted constantly throughout the years for not playing the youngsters. Yet this year, the games played statistic looks like this:
10 – Colby Rasmus – 94
9 – David Freese – 97
8 – Skip Schumaker – 117
7 – Matt Holliday – 124
6 – Ryan Theriot – 132
5 – Yadier Molina – 139
4 – Lance Berkman – 145
3 – Albert Pujols – 147
2 – Daniel Descalso – 148
1 – Jon Jay – 159
Now, obviously this is not a be-all end-all statistic. However, how many fans could have picked Danny D out of a lineup before this year? I don’t care how many of *us* would know, I imagine many of the average fans would not. Despite being one of the youngest players on the team, Descalso logged an awful lot of innings and positions this year (even as a late-inning substitute third baseman – I believe Derrick Goold called it a “defensive save”).
Just seemed intriguing to me that none of the opening day roster logged as many outings as the two that were mentioned as being bounced in and out of AAA the past year or two.
– Angela Weinhold, DiamondDiaries.net
Well sure, Carp’s finish doesn’t compare to those examples… But weren’t we talking about stats from this year only??
– Ray DeRousse
I think I would have to go with “11″. 11 wins in the post season, 11th Championship in ‘11. Carpenter had 11 wins during the regular season and Pujols had 11 hits versus Milwaukee in the NLCS. The Cards won game six of the World Series in the 11th inning. I am sure there are other “11″s that could be found if one were to go searching (for instance, the Cards gave up 11 runs to the Rangers through the first three games of the World Series), but I don’t have that kind of time. So, I am going with the 11th Championship in ‘11.
– JE Powell, STL: Fear the Red
Oh, I see what you’re focusing in on … My Gibson comparison.
Sure, those guys had great numbers, but I’m talking about being a competitor. In a tough, must-win game, I want Carp on the mound more than just about any other pitcher I can think of.
– Ray DeRousse, 
stlcardinalbaseball.com
For the record, all three of those guys were as big game as Gibson and Carpenter :) I would welcome any arguments of disagreement later tonight when I get the article posted.
– Bob Netherton the Carpenter Fan
I agree with all that Ray wrote about Chris Carpenter, and would further add in his record for October: 4-0 (although wins are probably not the kind of stat Pip was looking for!)
– Christine Coleman, Aaron Miles’ Fastball
.912 OPS, 153 OPS+
Those are Matt Holliday’s numbers for the 2011 season.
.906 OPS, 150 OPS+
Those are Albert Pujols’ numbers for the 2011 season.
Yes, it was a down season for Pujols offensively, by his own mammoth standards – but he still finished in the top five of NL MVP voting.
So what does that say about Holliday’s year at the plate?  Why is there a group of folks that still want to lambast the guy as if he’s just showing up and doing nothing?  In my opinion, the Cardinals are getting exactly what they’ve paid for out of Holliday, perhaps even more value-wise.  It’s really unfortunate he lost as much time as he did to injuries in 2011.

Oh, and just for good measure, to address the silly “clutch” argument – Holliday also outhit Pujols with runners in scoring position, RISP with two outs, late and close, and in high leverage at-bats.

This is my favorite 2011 statistical story – Matt Holliday is good at baseball, consistently, and I wish more Cardinal fans would appreciate him as such.
– Pitchers Hit Eighth (Nick), http://www.pitchershiteighth.com
Which is interesting since he should have ended up 3th or maybe 4th on his own team.  We were just talking about the 1979 MVP voting – spooky.    Post-season awards are turning into American Idol – it doesn’t matter what the players really did, it’s their celebrity or freak status.  #pffffffffffffffffffffft
So what does that say about Holliday’s year at the plate?  Why is there a group of folks that still want to lambast the guy as if he’s just showing up and doing nothing?  In my opinion, the Cardinals are getting exactly what they’ve paid for out of Holliday, perhaps even more value-wise.  It’s really unfortunate he lost as much time as he did to injuries in 2011.
I am TOTALLY on board with this line of discussion.  Matt Holliday has consistently contributed since he put the Cardinals uniform on (well, there were a couple of dropped balls, so nobody’s perfect).   Yeah, he got hurt at the end of the season.  Guess who else did, Orlando Freakin’ Cepeda in 1967 and he was a near no-show in 1968, but the Cardinals don’t go anywhere without him, and he’s in the Hall of Fame.   Yeah, Matt Holliday is pretty darn good at baseball.  He also came back a couple of days after laparoscopic  surgery when everybody was pretty much firing blanks except for Allen Craig.   Great call, Nick.
Oh, and just for good measure, to address the silly “clutch” argument – Holliday also outhit Pujols with runners in scoring position, RISP with two outs, late and close, and in high leverage at-bats.
This is my favorite 2011 statistical story – Matt Holliday is good at baseball, consistently, and I wish more Cardinal fans would appreciate him as such.
Honking for Holliday, coming to a t-shirt near you :) .
Bob Netherton

2011 United Cardinal Bloggers awards

Sunday, November 20th, 2011

Award 1: Cardinal Player of the Year

Lance Berkman

Matt Holliday

Albert Pujols

Comment: Berkman was the most-valuable Cardinal and led the team in win-probability added. Pujols was a close but clear second.

Award 2: Cardinal Pitcher of the Year

Chris Carpenter

Jaime Garcia

Jason Motte

Comment: Carpenter led the staff in WAR by far with 5.0. Garcia was a distant second with 3.6.

Award 3: Regular Season Game of the Year

April 3 vs. San Diego (Garcia shutout)

September 7 vs. Milwaukee (Carpenter shutout, Morgan dustup)

September 24 vs. Chicago (Marmol meltdown)

September 28 at Houston (Carpenter shutout on last day)

Comment: The Sept. 24 comeback proved the team’s never-say-die mettle. The game graph was one of the most delightful of the season, not to mention Ryan Theriot’s 10.78 leverage-index plate appearance, the highest of the team’s season.

Award 4: Post-Season Game of the Year

NLDS Game 5 (Carpenter vs. Halladay)

NLCS Game 6 (sent Cards to World Series)

WS Game 3 (Pujols 3 HR)

WS Game 6 (two rallies with one strike left)

WS Game 7 (champions)

Comment: As someone who remembers the 1986 World Series Game 6 (as a Mets fan), we must say that the 2011 Game 6 takes the cake, with not one but two utterly improbable comebacks.

Award 5: Surprise Player of the Year

Lance Berkman

Allen Craig

Jon Jay

Jason Motte


Comment: A surprise is something unexpected or astonishing. Berkman’s return to prominence may have been greater than planned, but it was just that: a return. Kyle Lohse, on the other hand, tossed career bests in FIP (3.67) and xFIP (4.04). Given consecutive ballooning-FIP seasons from 2008-2010, no one (not even Dave Duncan) could’ve expected Lohse’s best campaign of his career at age 32.

Award 6: Disappointing Player of the Year

Miguel Batista

Ryan Franklin

Colby Rasmus

Ryan Theriot

Comment: Rasmus had the deck stacked against him, with his manager unwilling to support him through a prolonged slump, which in turn led to a cascade of problems. A couple of minor injuries along the way didn’t help (abdominal muscle pull, calf strain), but ultimately Rasmus didn’t come close to following up his high-expectation-setting 4.3-WAR 2010 season (1.3 WAR in 94 games). As for the others, realistically low expectations meant that their poor seasons couldn’t be disappointing.

Award 7: Cardinal Rookie of the Year

Adron Chambers

Allen Craig

Lance Lynn

Eduardo Sanchez

Comment: Craig posted the fifth-most WAR among NL rookies and led the Senior Circuit’s noobs with a .399 wOBA.

Award 8: Pre-Season Acquisition of the Year

Lance Berkman

Nick Punto

Ryan Theriot

Comment: The fact that Berkman didn’t have any competition in this category shouldn’t detract from his worthiness. He was quite possibly the best offseason acquisition of any team last winter.

Award 9: Mid-Season Acquisition of the Year

Octavio Dotel

Rafael Furcal

Edwin Jackson

Marc Rzepczynski

Comment: Given the price paid for Dotel, Jackson and Rzepczynski and the lack of contract longevity for the first two, we couldn’t consider any of them (even Dotel, who had the most impact, with 0.9 WAR) as the best. Furcal didn’t provide the offensive bang or the defensive solidity that the team expected, but at the time, it was the best move.

Award 10: Most Anticipated Cardinal

Matt Adams

Zack Cox

Carlos Martinez

Shelby Miller

Yes, Adams is exciting and put himself on the map this year. But the most anticipated is still Miller, even if some shine is off the apple due to his worrying “drug of abuse” suspension.

Award 11: Best Individual Cardinal Blog (written mainly by one person)

Award 12: Best Team Cardinal Blog (written by two or more people)

Award 13: Best Professional Cardinal Blog

Bird Land

Cardinal Beat

Obviously, You’re Not A Golfer

Award 14: Best Rookie Cardinal Blog (began December 1, 2010 or later)

Aaron Miles‘ Fastball” /> Aaron Miles’ Fastball

Birds On The Bat 82

El Maquino

Bleed Cardinal Red With Me

Cards Droppings

Good Morning, Good Afternoon, Goodnight

Redbird Dugout

The Redbird Menace

Rob Says Really?

STL: Fear The Red

Award 15: Post of the Year

http://robsaysreally.blogspot.com/2011/07/open-letter-to-execs-of-mlb-network-and.html

http://www.cardinal70.com/stlouiscardinals/happily-ever-after.php

http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/2010/12/30/dumb-trade-ideas-belong/

http://www.birdsonthebat82.com/books-im-reading/recommended-reading-cardboard-gods-by-josh-wilker/

http://diamonddiaries.net/2011/06/22/9-years-later/

http://cardsnstuff.wordpress.com/2011/10/03/nls-best-rotation-1-nls-best-offense-1-on-to-the-stl/

http://stanmusialsstance.com/2011/10/09/a-pre-game-speech/

http://www.i70baseball.com/2011/10/28/backyard-dreams/

http://aeryssports.com/aaron-miles-fastball/friends-rivals-and-a-deciding-game/

http://aeryssports.com/aaron-miles-fastball/tony-la-russa-mvp/

http://www.fungoes.net/2011/10/10/why-the-cardinals-will-still-beat-the-brewers/

Award 16: Best UCB Project

Get To Know A UCBer

Progressive Game Blog

Roundtables

Top 7 Prospects

Award 17: Most Optimistic Cardinal Blog

Award 18: Best UCB Podcast

Conversations With C70

Gateway To Baseball Heaven

Pitchers Hit Eighth Podcast

Redbirds of a Feather

UCB Radio Hour

Award 19: Best UCB Twitterer

Award 20: Best Fake Cardinal Twitter Account

BuschSquirrel

Stlcardsbullpen

SirGlovingtonAWilson

TortyCraig

Defining success for Matheny in 2012

Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

[Today's United Cardinal Bloggers roundtable question comes from Deckacards at Cards 'N Stuff.]

And that brings us to our question:  What does Mike Matheny have to accomplish with this team in 2012 – with or without Pujols – to be considered “successful” in his rookie season?

Another 90 win season? Make the playoffs? Make the NLCS? Just contend? Win the World Series again? Just keep the team upright and drama-free? Etc. Make sure to include the reasoning behind your answer, perhaps even including a comparison between your expectations of Matheny…and what he needs to accomplish to be considered successful in 2012 (is there a difference?).

It’s possible to set expectations regardless of the personnel Matheny has. Actually, we would argue that roster-independent analysis is the only fair way to assess him. Success for Matheny means showing an ability to optimize his personnel (whoever they are), from lineup setting (no low-OBP leadoff men, please) to the rotation to minor-league callups. It also means consistently wise strategy, giving his team the best chance to win, whether it’s the running game or using his best relievers in the highest-leverage situations, regardless of “Save” conditions. It will be vital for Matheny to show restraint and not overreact when proven approaches appear to fail, even for long stretches (e.g., not putting on more hit and runs when the team is hitting into double plays). For someone with no managing experience, having patience with the long season and concepts like regression may be the most difficult. One unique challenge for Matheny will be helping the team adjust from a command-and-control environment to something conceivably less so. Clubhouse control will look different — perhaps a more self-policing approach — so Matheny will need to shepherd that change, most likely by relying on the team’s veterans, who have a somewhat checkered record of leadership (see the Game 2 walkout).

Those criteria to us are more an indicator of a manager’s success than wins and losses, which are mostly dependent on players, and certainly not playoff success, which of course is a crapshoot.

2011 ESPN SweetSpot Awards

Sunday, November 13th, 2011

As part of the benign oligarchy that is the group of ESPN SweetSpot bloggers, we occasionally participate in group votes. Today we present our completed ballot for the 2011 MLB awards. Alas, no Cardinals made it, though Allen Craig was an honorable mention for Rookie of the Year.

National League

MVP

Rk Player Team
1 Matt Kemp Dodgers
2 Ryan Braun Brewers
3 Joey Votto Reds
4 Prince Fielder Brewers
5 Roy Halladay Phillies

Cy  Young

Rk Player Team
1 Roy Halladay Phillies
2 Clayton Kershaw Dodgers
3 Cliff Lee Phillies

Rookie of the Year

Rk Player Team
1 Danny Espinosa Nationals
2 Craig Kimbrel Braves
3 Brandon Beachy Braves
American League

MVP

Rk Player Team
1 Jose Bautista Blue Jays
2 Jacoby Ellsbury Red Sox
3 Miguel Cabrera Tigers
4 Justin Verlander Tigers
5 Alex Gordon Royals

Cy  Young

Rk Player Team
1 CC Sabathia Yankees
2 Justin Verlander Tigers
3 Dan Haren Angels

Rookie of the Year

Rk Player Team
1 Michael Pineda Mariners
2 Dustin Ackley Mariners
3 Ivan Nova Yankees

Pay Pujols for 10 years, more than $200 million?

Thursday, November 10th, 2011

[Today's United Cardinal Bloggers roundtable question comes from El Maquino, appropriately about El Maquino himself, Albert Pujols.]

SI’s Jon Heyman recently reported that the Cardinals won’t be able to expand their original nine-year, $200m offer to Albert Pujols by a whole lot this offseason.  My question to you is: Would you pay Pujols for 10 years, north of $200m?
There’s a lot to consider: How much of a bargain he’s been for 11 years, how his salary would affect the rest of the team’s payroll,  his last years in the Majors, alternatives if he doesn’t sign, what he means to the city and the team.
Let me know what you all would do if you owned your favorite team!  (I keep him around at all cost, FYI)

No. The problem for the Cardinals may not be whether they pay more than 9/$200 million, but whether they have to. Given the scarcity of teams who both need a first baseman and can afford Pujols, the Cardinals will have only slightly more competition than they faced last winter, when they had sole negotiating rights. And John Mozeliak has a bit of a history here, handing Kyle Lohse a four-year deal before he hit the market and outbidding — who, we’re not sure — for Matt Holliday. So the relevant question is: Would they need to pay him more than 9/200? Though we expect at least a couple of other teams (e.g., Rangers and Angels) to bid, we doubt they would approach that mark.

As far as the bargain of his past contract goes, this is a non-starter. Both parties voluntarily entered into the agreement back in 2004, each believing that the deal was fair. Pujols, for all he knew, could’ve blown his elbow that spring and never played another game, and the Cardinals wouldn’t have asked for their $100 million back. Neither should Pujols “ask” for it back as he negotiates the next deal.

Ray gives some well-considered reasons why the idea of paying him “whatever it takes” isn’t helpful. And as Tom already intimated, we’re already beyond reasonable with a nine-year deal, when a seven-year deal starting in an age-32 season is even pushing it. To put it into perspective, Miguel Cabrera got “only” eight when he was 25. Even Barry Zito’s contact — regarded as one of the worst all-time — is only seven years and $126 million and even that was signed when he was 29.

Yes, baseball is a business, but that doesn’t mean that the owners are the only businessmen. Players are not serfs with limited rights (anymore) but highly compensated professionals in their own regard. Ownership has a downward force on salaries, but players exert an similar force upward, so the idea that “baseball is a business” should only be understood in neutral terms (other than the fact that the sport being a business has enabled us to witness the best baseball on earth). Albert Pujols has as much chance (or as some seem to believe of the organization, an obligation) to act “with his heart” as the management does. To hear Pujols tell it — “It’s not about the money. I already got my money. It’s about winning and that’s it.” — the World Series title (and two in the last six years) is all he needs.